You repeatedly promote the book, completely ignoring the facts presented to you. Now you've come up with a win of $1 for each spin with a bankroll of $350. Do you not remember the illustrations you posted in previous messages? Allow me to remind you. Here they are:
As you can see, I highlighted in red the profit from winnings for the initial bets in your progression. They range from 30 pence (bets in your scheme in British pounds) to 80 pence. At today's exchange rates, this amounts to 37 cents to 1 US dollar. And not always 1 US dollar, you know.
I've already demonstrated above that with the approach to bets you've indicated, you will inevitably lose. According to your own scheme, your loss would be £222 or £863 (I circled the total bankroll in blue). Returning this loss with winnings of 30-80 pence will likely take you several months, assuming fate is favorable to you, and you don't lose another £222 or £863.
What $350 bankroll are you mentioning when none of the options you provided contains such amounts, even when converting pounds to dollars? You're inventing something new as the discussion progresses. Ok, even if you have $350, you'll just loose it.
Your advertising is aimed at novice players who know little about roulette, and I presume they would willingly believe the fictions you're telling.
Yes, now I see that my reply has been published. Thank you for that.
I wonder why your software doesn't pay as much attention to the messages from Kareva7, who's using this discussion solely for book promotion purposes, as it does to my messages? 🙂
Just look through her messages and count phrases "Balvinder sambhi", "2 corner system", "book Breaking the Roulette wheel" and try to find any other useful plot in those messages. It's plain as a piece of cake. 🙂
That's good you spotted this. You're right about the book, but as far as it's in the right thread (about roulette) and no links included...Yeah, we're quite hesitant when if comes to deleting user's posts.
では、あなたの説明によると、私が、たとえば、リンクを投稿せずに YouTube で何かについて言及した場合、それは OK になるのでしょうか?つまり、私が次のように言うとします。「ルーレットの戦略について詳しく知るために、YouTube または Google で『ある製品名』を検索してください!」 — それでいいでしょうか？
So, according to your explanation, if I, say, mention anything on YouTube without posting a link to it, it will be OK? I mean, if I say something like: 'Hey, guys, just look for 'some product name' on YouTube or Google to learn more about some roulette strategy!' — that will do?
Well, my experience in discussions here tells me I'll have some problems with that. 🙂
OK, I'm just kidding. 🙂 Let her promote the book since other people can share their thoughts about it, to keep newbies safe.
You repeatedly promote the book, completely ignoring the facts presented to you. Now you've come up with a win of $1 for each spin with a bankroll of $350. Do you not remember the illustrations you posted in previous messages? Allow me to remind you. Here they are:
As you can see, I highlighted in red the profit from winnings for the initial bets in your progression. They range from 30 pence (bets in your scheme in British pounds) to 80 pence. At today's exchange rates, this amounts to 37 cents to 1 US dollar. And not always 1 US dollar, you know.
I've already demonstrated above that with the approach to bets you've indicated, you will inevitably lose. According to your own scheme, your loss would be £222 or £863 (I circled the total bankroll in blue). Returning this loss with winnings of 30-80 pence will likely take you several months, assuming fate is favorable to you, and you don't lose another £222 or £863.
What $350 bankroll are you mentioning when none of the options you provided contains such amounts, even when converting pounds to dollars? You're inventing something new as the discussion progresses. Ok, even if you have $350, you'll just loose it.
Your advertising is aimed at novice players who know little about roulette, and I presume they would willingly believe the fictions you're telling.
Firstly, what two systems are you talking about? You wrote about one system concerning bets on 2 corners. The fact that different progressions and entry expectations are used there doesn't make this one game system two different ones.
Secondly, what you have posted is not a winning system. It doesn't work in the long run. I confirmed this with real examples on real roulette tables in various online casinos, showing that bets according to the system you specified would often exceed the limits set by your system.
Thirdly, as I mentioned before, your proposed strategy is not a system for continuous play in the long run, as you claim. It suggests waiting for a favorable situation, entering the game, winning, and waiting for the next entry into the game. This approach is not a strategy for the long run, as you assert.
Finally, I don't recall ever saying that I have any winning systems for you to demand that I publish them. I have various tactics that I mentioned in various topics on this forum, tactics that help win on one table for a short period. But any 'universal foolproof systems' — leave those tales for inexperienced users.
Here are a few tactics off the top of my head for short-term play:
Wait for the non-appearance of any category of even chances for a long time (for example, 20-21 misses on red) and bet on this category using the Martingale progression until you win, then stop and wait again;
Wait for the non-appearance of any dozen or column for a long time (for example, 25-28 misses in the first dozen) and bet on this category using the Fibonacci progression until you win, then stop and wait again;
Wait for consecutive hits of any one dozen or column for a long time (for example, 10-12 hits in the first column) and then bet on the other two, increasing the bet by 4 four times after each loss until you win, then stop and wait again;
Wait until the number of hits in any dozen or column in the last 50 spins is less than 8% (for example, 2 dozen hits in the last 50 spins occurred in only 6% of cases), then bet on that dozen using the Fibonacci progression until you win, then stop and wait again…
There are dozens of examples like these; I won't list them all. Each of them provides an opportunity to win in a very short distance in 1-5 spins. The situations I described occur on gaming tables all the time, allowing you to finish the game on one table and almost immediately go to another table and win there. If you are monitoring a sufficiently large number of tables simultaneously, as I do, for example.
Each corner has its own count. I will use 8 9 11 12 corner for this example but you need to track all corners at the same time to track all corners.
This is a cycle system. This means when a number appears example 8 9 11 12, does a 8 9 11 12 the next direct spin appear? No count 1 then we wait for another 8 9 11 12 to appear. Yes then we reset back to 0 count.
1. Track all 23 possible corner sets simultaneously.
2. Any corner set must appear 65 times BEFORE you even start to bet.
3. After the 65th appearance that set is qualified and then you start to bet. You bet for one spin only. Now:
a) you hit -> it's over. Look/wait for another corner set qualification and start a new game.
b) you missed -> you wait for that very corner to appear again and repeat your bet again, for one spin only.
4. You can have up to 25 such 'attack attempts', using the progression Kareva7 provided above. The goal is to catch an immediate repeat.
オンラインルーレット（オートルーレット）はRNGシステム上で動作します。 ( RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR) で、そのようなシステムには、混合セクターをスローするとき、同じセクターをスローするとき、特定のセクターがパーセンテージを下回ったとき、およびその他の多くのオプションがある特定の期間があります。
Me, Zoran and Mrs. Allo4ka are top roulette connoisseurs.
Don't invent hot water for us.
Tell that story to inexperienced new players.
Can you understand for once !!!
THERE IS NO SYSTEM THAT BRINGS SURE PROFIT.
what did you do at corner 8...9...11...12. ???
Well it's exactly the same angle as any roulette angle, 1,2,4,5...13,14,16,17...28,29,31,32. IT'S ALL THE SAME.
Can your brain figure that out?
Every professional, experienced roulette player doesn't want to talk about a system. Every experienced roulette player has his own individual tactics. And everything is based on the fact that a profit can be made in the short term. And which tactic will be applied depends on the current situation on the table where we are playing at that moment.
On-line roulette (auto roulette) works on the RNG system. ( RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR) and such a system has certain periods when it throws mixed sectors...when it throws the same sectors...when a certain sector comes out below the percentage and many more options.
I know how to recognize those moments and build the current game on that observation. I stay as short as possible on that roulette. I make a profit and leave that roulette.
You are more boring with your system for total beginners. You came here to advertise a book that has 1 review, xaxaxa.
YOU ARE FUNNY 🙂
Gospodine KAREVA7....molim te
Ja, Zoran i gospođa Allo4ka smo vrhunski poznavaoci ruleta.
Nemoj nama da izmišljaš toplu vodu.
Tu priču pričaj neiskusnim novim igračima.
Da li ti možeš jednom da shvatiš !!!
NE POSTOJI SISTEM KOJI DONOSI SIGURAN PROFIT.
šta si navalio na ugao 8...9...11...12. ???
Pa to je potpuno isti ugao kao bilo koji ugao na ruletu, 1,2,4,5...13,14,16,17....28,29,31,32. SVE JE TO ISTO.
Da li to tvoj mozak može da shvati?
Svaki profesionalni, iskusan igrač ruleta o nekom sistemu ne želi da razgovara. Svaki iskusan igrač ruleta ima neku svoju individualnu taktiku. I sve se zasniva na tome da se na kratkoročnim planu može ostvariti dobitak. A koja će taktika biti primenjena zavisi od trenutne situacije na stolu na kom u tom trenutku igramo.
On line rulet (auto rulet) radi na sistemu RNG. ( GENERATOR SLUČAJNIH BROJEVA) i takav sistem ima određene periode kada baca mešovite sektore...kada baca iste sektore...kada određeni sektor izlazi ispod procenta i još mnogo opcija.
Ja umem da prepoznam te momente i na tom opažanju izgradim trenutnu igru. Ostajem što kraće na tom ruletu. Ostvarujem profit i napuštam taj rulet.
Dosadan si više sa svojim sistemom za totalne početnike. Ovde si došao da reklamiraš knjigu koja ima 1 recenziju, xaxaxa.
Let me explain the previous game. As I guessed number 4 then 2.
I followed the roulette. In the last 100 throws, the sector from 32 to 36 worked very poorly. Number 2 and 4 not at all. When 19 came down I simply placed the main bet on 2 and 4. It could have come down on 21..or oper 19..or 15 but it's all a matter of probability.
I have said more than once: I DO NOT RECOGNIZE THE LUCK FACTOR. That's just a word (happiness).
And it fell 4, then 2. It happened. Ok..let's move on. Orfanell also fell poorly. I start based on the analysis of the previous rolls to favor the sector of zero spins and continue towards number 17. I left out the small series because it fell in the previous period and with these auto roulettes there is a rule that when a series has a lot of falls it must also stop.
You noticed. The best numbers that gave him a plus after 2 and 4 were the orphans....6...1...and finally 17 which brought the final plus. Also the repetition of the number 35 was logical because the sector zero deck did not repeat itself
(it didn't come out 2 X in a row a lot of throws.) And logically I boosted it. And it happened (that law of probability again) 😉
After the winning number 17 and a payout of around rsd 53,000 (€450) I replayed the game to honor the shot. That's how it's always done. To be honest, I was expecting a small series, but number 32 fell. It would have a small payout. My fault because there was a lapse in concentration. I should have played it better.
Final balance. Initial deposit RSDC 3,300 (€25)...
Do not let roulette keep you in the game for more than 30 minutes max.
Because then the concentration relaxes and the brain pulls you further into the game, there is a slight addiction and the desire to get more. And that's the mistake of 98% of players. THERE IS THE ADVANTAGE OF ROULETTE. And not in mathematics.
Mathematics is on the roulette side only on paper, IN PRACTICE IT IS NOT!
She is on the player's side for the short term.
So..don't stay long on roulette...!
Go out and come back after 2 hours when the brain is back to zero again.
Da objasnim prethodnu igru. Kako sam pogodio broj 4 pa 2.
Pratio sam rulet. Poslednjih 100 bacanja sektor od 32 do 36 je veoma slabo radio. Broj 2 i 4 nikako. Kada je pao 19 ja sam jednostavno stavio glavni ulog na 2 i 4. Mogao je pasti 21..ili oper 19..ili 15 ali sve je to zakon verovarptnoće.
Rekao sam više puta: JA FAKTOR SREĆA NE PRIZNAJEM. Tohje samo reč ( sreća).
I pao je 4 , zatim 2. Desilo se. Ok..idemo dalje. Orfanell je slabo padao takođe. Počinjem na osnovu analize prethodnih bacanja da favorizujem sektor zero spila pa dalje ka broju 17. Malu seriju sam izostavio jer je ona padala u prethodnom periodu i kod ovih auto ruleta postoji pravilo da kada neka serija bude imala dosta padanja mora i da stane.
Primetili ste. Najbolji brojevi koji mu mi dali plus posle 2 i 4 su orfaneli....6...1...i na kraju 17 koji je doneo konačni plus. Takođe repeticija broja 35 je bila logična jer sektor zero špil se nije ponovio
(nije izašao 2 X redom dosta bacanja.) I logično sam ga pojačao. I desilo se ( opet taj zakon verovatnoće) 😉
Posle pobedničkog broja 17 i isplate oko 53.000 rsd (450 €) ponovio sam igru da bih ispoštovao udarac. Tako se uvek radi. Iskren da budem tada sam očekivao malu seriju ali pao he broj 32. Imao he malu isplatu. Moja greška jer je došlo do popuštanja koncentracije. Trebao sam ga bolje odigrati.
Ne dozvolite da vas rulet zadrži duže od 30 minuta max u igri.
Jer tada popušta koncentracije a mozak vas vuče dalje u igru, dolazi do lagane zavisnosti i želje da dobijete više. E tu je greška 98 % igrača. TU JE PREDNOST RULETA. A ne u matematici.
Matematika je na strani ruleta samo na papiru, U PRAKSI NIJE !
Ona je na strani igrača na kratkoročnom periodu.
Zato..ne ostajte dugo na ruletu...!
Izađite pa se vratite posle 2 sata kada se mozak opet vrati na nulu.
では、あなたの説明によると、私が、たとえば、リンクを投稿せずに YouTube で何かについて言及した場合、それは OK になるのでしょうか?つまり、私が次のように言うとします。「ルーレットの戦略について詳しく知るために、YouTube または Google で『ある製品名』を検索してください!」 — それでいいでしょうか？
So, according to your explanation, if I, say, mention anything on YouTube without posting a link to it, it will be OK? I mean, if I say something like: 'Hey, guys, just look for 'some product name' on YouTube or Google to learn more about some roulette strategy!' — that will do?
Well, my experience in discussions here tells me I'll have some problems with that. 🙂
OK, I'm just kidding. 🙂 Let her promote the book since other people can share their thoughts about it, to keep newbies safe.
I think it has already been explained how it works on this forum and Daniel also stated how it is. Hehe, but I noticed that you also wrote that you were joking, so I take it you already know the rules, because they were communicated with you. 🙂
Anyway, of course everyone can make a personal opinion who understands the roulette topic.
zorans71- YES I am funny and I win. You play but lose. this why you will not post a winning system for to see and check. I have posted two free systems. Players can check they win every time. This is winning not losing with your losing tactics.
Every gambler say I am winner, where is your proof? there is no proof, No confirmations your a a long term winner. No articles, No books, Just talk with losses. I have not been playing roulette for 30 years but all I see is losers everywhere.
The only way to confirm winning or losing is post your system with exact conditions. we all test, then see results. Balvinder winning, zorans71 losing confirmed.
You haven't provided a single piece of evidence that you win with any of your systems. Just words. I've shown you with real data from real casinos that it doesn't work. But you continue to prove something without any facts.
Your promotion won't work anymore: any user who starts reading this discussion will see that behind your words and your system, there is nothing but loss. It's unlikely that anyone will buy your book after this. Look for success somewhere else.
I've written to you about the conditions under which your system with 2 corners can work successfully, but it seems you don't care about that. You need to sell the book. 😂
