ホーム オンラインカジノ Unibet Casinoのレビュー

Unibet Casinoのレビュー

日本在住のプレイヤー向けの評価: 9.1
9.7 評価
とても良い
評判
日本在住のプレイヤー向けの評価: 9.1
とても良い
評判
作成者: Matej Novota | このレビューの最終更新: 2020-02-18T00:00Z  

Unibet Casinoを厳正にレビューした結果、完璧の評価を与える決定をいたしました。つまり、このカジノは最高なカジノのうち一つです。 レビューを行う際、プレイヤーからのクレーム、推定収益、ライセンス、ゲームの信頼性、カスタマーサポートの質、利用規約の公平性、関連カジノ、出金と賞金額上限、その他の要素をCasino Guruでは精査しています。 Unibet Casinoは下記のカジノの関連カジノであるため、このカジノの評価は関連カジノにも影響されます。 レビュー全文を読み、このカジノについてさらに知ろう。

Casino Guruの調査と見積もりの結果、収益に関してはUnibet Casinoは最大規模のオンラインカジノ です。収益もプレイヤー数もかなり多いです。 カジノの収益は重要な要素となります。というのも、規模の大きいカジノでの高額賞金の出金は問題がないはずですが、規模の小さいカジノは出金が困難な場合があるからです。

現在データベース内にこのカジノに関するクレームが11件関連カジノには24件のクレームが存在します。 このクレームを理由に、関連カジノの1,754のブラックポイントを含め、このカジノには3,638のブラックポイントが与えられました。 クレームとブラックポイントについては下記からさらに詳しく知れます。

レビュー内の情報や評価が完璧であることを考えれば、Unibet Casinoは完璧なオンラインカジノだといえます。完璧なカジノを探しているのであれば、このカジノがおすすめです。

さらに読む 表示を減らす
日本
在住者
許可されています
ヴァージニア州
からのIPアドレス
ブロックされていません
VPN
の使用
禁止されています
ウェブサイト用
言語
英語 (+16)
ライブチャット用
言語
英語 (+17)
Eメールサポート用
言語
英語 (+17)
入金不要ボーナス
利用不可
入金ボーナス*利用規約が適用されます
入金額の100%から最大€100
決済方法
全て表示する(17)
ゲームプロバイダー
全て表示する(47)
オーナー
Kindred group
設立
1997
出金上限
EURに限定されていません
認可当局
マルタ
とても良い
ジブラルタル
良い
イギリス
とても良い
興味深い事実
  • スカンジナビアとヨーロッパのほとんどの選手
プラス
  • 幅広いライブディーラーゲーム
  • ゲームの良い選択
  • 1997年以来オンライン最大のオンラインギャンブルオペレーターの1つ
  • 無制限の引き出し
  • 優れた評判と多くのeGaming賞
  • iOSおよびAndroid用のモバイルカジノアプリケーション
マイナス
  • デビットカードで行われた預金の3%の手数料

Unibet Casinoと関連カジノへのクレーム (35)

インターネット上での広範囲にわたるリサーチの結果、Unibet Casinoと関連ブランドのカジノに関連しそうなクレームが35件発見されました。カジノの収益と、クレームの深刻さと信用性を考えると、Unibet Casinoの評判評価はとても良いとなります。

「とても良い」評価
自動翻訳
Unibet Casinoへの直接のクレーム
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 1117
The player was asked to send documents for verification over and over again while his case remains unresolved.
Hans, a player from Germany, played in the casino 24hbet where he had €15,000 left. All the 24hbet casino's players accounts were transferred to Unibet casino. The player created a new account with Unibet and provided all the documents needed for verification. With adding some additional documents, they were all approved. After that, Hans asked the casino via email if he could receive the remaining balance from 24hbet casino. The casino responded stating that they need his ID and utility documents again, even though those were approved just recently. When Hans asked the casino for an update, he kept receiving the same answer, to send the documents for verification again. Hans became very frustrated and this case remains open.
係争中の金額: €15,000 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 5/2018
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 224
プレイヤーの賞金はキャンセルされました。
Player said that he had asked the live chat about the reason why only part of his withdrawal request was approved and the other part was pending. He was told that his account needs to be verified further and they needed to call him too. The casino called him and asked him some questions for verifications, however, the player said he had failed to answer correctly one question and his account got blocked. Then his pending withdrawal was canceled and his deposit was returned to him. The casino replied by saying that the player had breached the terms and conditions but he denied these accusations saying he won fairly and that the casino had been seeking for reasons why not to pay him his winnings. No more reaction from the casino, no more update since then.
係争中の金額: €8,686 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 10/2018
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 72
The player's bonus funds were confiscated and his account was closed due to a failed document verification.
Joe, a player from the UK, made a deposit of £100 and took a bonus. He met all the wagering requirements and requested a withdrawal of £2,119. When he couldn't complete the withdrawal, he contacted a live chat representative and found out that the casino did some internal security checks and needed him to send identification documents for verification. The player provided the documents to the casino, but they were denied due to his documents failed their verification process. His bonus funds were confiscated and the account was closed as per their terms and conditions. This case remains opened.
係争中の金額: £2,119 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 7/2017
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 51
The casino closed the player's account due to the terms and conditions being breached.
After the casino's longtime player made his first deposit, he asked the casino to close all of his duplicate accounts and leave him with only one. That one account was successfully verified and had a leftover balance of €400. But when the player tried to log in, he wasn't able to do so. The casino informed him that the account was blocked due to fraudulent card activity that was reported to them by the player's bank. The player decided to complain to MGA (Malta Gaming Authority). This case remains open since the casino never provided the player with any relevant proof about broken terms and conditions rules.
係争中の金額: €400 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 4/2016
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 32
The player's account was closed without any relevant reason given.
Nikolay, a player of Bulgarian nationality, but a citizen of Holland, opened an account. He made a deposit, took and used a bonus, completed the wagering requirements, and requested a withdrawal of €770. He was asked by the casino to send documents for verification which lead to his account closure. The player thought that they closed his account due to being a Bulgarian nationality, but the casino told him that was not the reason. They told him that he knows exactly why they rejected him as a player. The player claimed that he had no clue why his documents were not accepted. The Askgamblers representative asked the casino to provide a valid proof about the player breaking the terms and conditions. They never responded.
係争中の金額: €770 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 6/2017
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 31
The player's account didn't pass the document verification on multiple tries.
A player from Germany with a Spanish ID made a deposit of £80 and was asked to provide documents for verification. Unfortunately, the casino repeatedly didn't accept those documents, even though some of them were posted as a legitimate proof at the casino's website. The customer support couldn't explain to the player why his documents weren't accepted and he had lost his £80. There is no update on this case.
係争中の金額: £80 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 5/2018
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 7
The player didn't pass the document verification and his account was closed.
The player registered at the casino and a few weeks later, he was asked by the casino to provide documents for verification. He sent those documents and they were successfully verified, but his account was blocked later on anyways. The casino claimed that the documents sent for verification did not pass their verification. The player was ready to provide the documents for verification again, but the casino never responded to the request. There is no update on this case.
係争中の金額: ?? (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 6/2017
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
計417のブラックポイントを持った6件の類似クレームを表示する
ノーリアクションポリシー、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 287
Player's account was closed, their winnings were confiscated, and the deposit was returned to them due to the casino's decision.
After the player requested a withdrawal, the casino asked them to provide different documents for verification, which they did. Later on, their account was closed, their winnings were confiscated and their deposit was returned to them. The casino claimed that according to their terms and conditions, they were allowed to do so any time they decided to. The complaint was left without any response from the casino and it remains unsolved.
係争中の金額: £2,550 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 1/2019
さらに読む: thepogg.com
さらに読む
支払い遅延、ステータス不明
ブラックポイント: 39
Extremely long payment and verification process without a resolution.
The player complained that the processing of his withdrawal request was taking way too long. ThePogg representative tried to help him and received an information from the casino that the ID that was submitted for verification wasn't genuine to them. On the other hand, the casino failed to provide any details regarding the specific issues with the ID. The complaint remains unresolved.
係争中の金額: ?? (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 10/2015
さらに読む: thepogg.com
さらに読む
支払い遅延、ステータス不明
ブラックポイント: 19
Over extremely long withdrawal process of such small amounts.
The player made three deposits of $85, $90, and $20. He tried to withdraw some of his winnings but first, he needed to send some documents for verification. He sent those requested documents to the casino, but they wouldn't accept them. The casino was supposed to contact the player about an update via email and they did, one year later!!! They asked him to provide the same documents for verification again. During that year, the player closed his Entropay account and lost any hope to ever receive his winnings that he won so fairly. In the complaint, he also mentioned that he would like the casino to refund him on at least one of his deposits through a Neteller account. There is no update on this complaint.
係争中の金額: $195 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 5/2014
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
計19のブラックポイントを持った1件の類似クレームを表示する
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 5
非常に長い技術的な問題の調査。
ライブカジノでプレーした後、プレイヤーは賞金の認定を受けていませんでした。彼にカスタマーサービスに連絡するように指示する警告ポップアウトメッセージがあり、彼はすぐにそれを行いました。彼らは、技術部門が何が起こったのかを調査するだろうと彼に話しましたが、更新を要求するカジノ4の電子メールを送信した後、彼らは彼への応答を停止しました。彼らはまた、苦情に答えたことはなく、それは未解決のままでした。
係争中の金額: ?? (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 6/2014
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
Casinohuoneに関するクレーム (同じオーナー)
カジノ側の証拠不十分
ブラックポイント: 353 (このカジノのポイント数35)
The casino claimed they were unable to identify the player as a real person.
After a successful withdrawal of €1,700, the player requested another one in the amount of €1,300. The player continued on playing and all of a sudden got an error and when they tried to log back into the account, it was locked for the next 24-hours and needed to contact the casino's support. The casino asked them to send in all kinds of documents for verification and they did so straight away. After that, the casino claimed that they were unable to identify the player as a real person and once they would be done with a KYC process, they would pay the player their winning. They never gave an update to the complaint and it remained unresolved.
係争中の金額: €1,300 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 4/2015
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
Bingo.com Casinoに関するクレーム (同じオーナー)
自己排除に失敗
ブラックポイント: 778 (このカジノのポイント数77)
Player tried to receive their deposit funds back to the self-exclusion at the casino's sister site.
The player opened an account and soon after that, they found out that the casino belonged to the same casino group from which they had self-excluded themself before. They then contacted the casino and asked for a refund of their deposit but they didn't react to their request nor the complaint itself. There's no other information available ever since.
係争中の金額: £1,200 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 12/2019
さらに読む: thepogg.com
さらに読む
カジノ側の証拠不十分
ブラックポイント: 250 (このカジノのポイント数25)
The player was accused by the casino to had abused the system and confiscated all of his funds.
The player played at the casino and used a refer-a-friend bonus to gain NOK1,500 in addition to his NOK100 initial deposit but the casino blocked his account and accused him of abusing the system and confiscated all of his money. The player admitted there might've been some activity seen as suspicious with his friend he had referred, but he wanted his NOK100deposit back. The casino only provided a vague statement with terms they claim the player breached and won't comment any further.
係争中の金額: kr100 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 10/2018
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 176 (このカジノのポイント数17)
The player was accused of having opened two accounts but the casino allowed him to continue playing.
The player used a bonus and won NOK58,000. However, he was denied his withdrawal and accused with opening two accounts. He got his deposit back plus €,1000 which looked very strange. However, the player continued to play and won again, and this time, he was allowed to withdraw the entire amount of €3,500 without any problems. Causes some doubts in the casino's system, but they still owe the player €5,800. There is no update on this case and it remains unresolved.
係争中の金額: kr58,000 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 6/2018
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
反応がない、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 60 (このカジノのポイント数6)
Player wasn't able to provide documents for verification.
The player couldn't pass the account verification because they were unable to provide utility bills since they were renting not owning a place. The casino refused to respond to the complaint and it remains unresolved.
係争中の金額: ?? (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 12/2019
さらに読む: thepogg.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 0
プレイヤーのアカウントは説明なしに閉鎖されました。
After winning a couple of hundred euros, the player was asked to provide documents for verification, which they did right away. Unfortunately, later on, their account was closed and their winnings were confiscated without an explanation. The player wasn't aware of breaking any rules or terms. The casino became unresponsive and the complaint remained unresolved.
係争中の金額: ?? (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 7/2013
さらに読む: thepogg.com
さらに読む
Maria Casinoに関するクレーム (同じオーナー)
カジノ側の証拠不十分
ブラックポイント: 200 (このカジノのポイント数20)
Bonus abuse accusation, deposit returned.
Player complained that upon his registration he had to pass through the verification checks first, then he made a deposit and used a bonus. He won some money and asked for a withdrawal. He was asked for further verification documents which he provided but later his account was suspended and he was accused of a bonus abuse. Casino proposed to return his deposit. Player refused any bonus abuse accusations. Proofs couldn't be shown. No more update since then.
係争中の金額: £500 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 5/2017
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 24 (このカジノのポイント数2)
プレーヤーのアカウントは、関係のない状況のために閉鎖されました。
The player complained that she had passed through all the verifications checks upon sign up. She then received an email from the casino informing her about new rules with which she didn't agree and asked for her account to be closed. However, she was unable to withdraw the remaining funds because the casino required more documents for verification and they replied that the player had already received an explanation this situation by email and asked the player to provide additional documents for verification. The casino tried to reach her via phone but she said she usually didn't answer to unknown numbers. No more update since then.
係争中の金額: kr200 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 4/2017
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
32Red Casinoに関するクレーム (同じオーナー)
カジノ側の証拠不十分
ブラックポイント: 8462 (このカジノのポイント数846)
The player wasn't able to provide sufficient enough documents for verification and his account remained closed and his deposit was returned to him.
The player didn't have a problem with his previous withdrawal and requested another one for the amount of €12,000. He was asked by the casino to provide the information where did the funds that he played with came from. He provided this document where it stated that his daughter provided the funds for him. About ten days later he received an answer from the casino that said the document was not sufficient enough and the account would remain closed and his deposit in the amount of €6,000 would be returned to him. The player decided to take the legal steps to have this matter resolved. The case remains unresolved.
係争中の金額: €12,000 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 6/2018
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
反応がない、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 5358 (このカジノのポイント数535)
Player's withdrawal request of £50,000 was delayed.
The player requested a withdrawal of £50,000 and was asked to provide all kinds of documents for the account verification. He sent everything in and waited for the casino to respond. After that, the player contacted the customer service on a few occasions and was told that the security team was checking his documents and they were not sure how long it was going to take them. There is no further information available and the complaint remains unsolved.
係争中の金額: £50,000 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 4/2019
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
反応がない、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 365 (このカジノのポイント数36)
プレーヤーは確認に失敗し、アカウントは閉鎖されました。
The player requested a withdrawal and sent all the documents for verification, but they were insufficient and the casino confiscated their winnings and also decided to close their account. The casino refused to communicate with the player, didn't react to this complaint and ever since then, it remains unsolved.
係争中の金額: £1,000 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 2/2019
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
カジノ側の証拠不十分
ブラックポイント: 283 (このカジノのポイント数28)
The player was accused of duplicate accounts, abused bonuses, and due to that, all the funds were seized.
The player followed all the terms and conditions while she had won £5,000 with her £10 free cash bonus. After she had sent all the documents for verification, the casino accused her of double accounts and abused bonuses. She insisted that there was a mistake due to the fact that she had only recently moved to a new apartment and perhaps this was the cause of misunderstanding. The casino didn't want to accept the woman's words and refused to pay her the winning. The case remains unresolved.
係争中の金額: £5,000 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 11/2014
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
バグ
ブラックポイント: 80 (このカジノのポイント数8)
The player's winnings were not accredited to them due to the technical difficulties while playing on the casino's mobile app.
The player had an issue while he played a game on his casino's mobile app and the winnings were not credited to their account. The player tried to resolve this issue with a support team and also wrote them an email but nothing changed. Casino advised the player to not to play this game until the technical problem would be resolved. There is no further information on this case.
係争中の金額: ?? (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 10/2017
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
反応がない、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 60 (このカジノのポイント数6)
Player cannot request a withdrawal.
The player is not able to withdraw his money for more than 2 weeks. We closed the complaint as ‘unresolved’ because the casino failed to reply.
係争中の金額: €100 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 12/2019
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 27 (このカジノのポイント数2)
プレイヤーの賞金は、リンクされたアカウントの告発により没収されました。
32Redカジノで新しいアカウントを開いた後、プレーヤーは£10相当の無料スピンを受け取りました。彼らは賭け金要件を完了し、賞金の引き出しを要求しました。しかし、カジノはすべての資金を没収し、プレーヤーがリンクされたアカウントを持っていると非難しました。プレイヤーは、以前にアカウントを持っていなかったと言いました。カジノは、調停者を介して、またはプレーヤーと直接、このケースに対処することに消極的でした。
係争中の金額: £400 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 7/2019
さらに読む: thepogg.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 7 (このカジノのポイント数1)
Failed self-exclusion.
The player admitted to the chat representative that he had a gambling problem and asked to be self-excluded. The chat representative advised the player to send an email since he couldn't do so through a live chat. He wrote the email but still was able to gamble further €25,000. He begged the casino to have his deposits returned to him because of his gambling addiction. The player contacted the UKGC. There is no further information on the case.
係争中の金額: ?? (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 7/2017
さらに読む: casinomeister.com
さらに読む
Roxy Palace Casinoに関するクレーム (同じオーナー)
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 0
Player's account canceled, all funds confiscated. The casino claimed it was due to a breach of terms and conditions.
After winning some amount of money, the player's account was canceled and all their funds were confiscated. This left the player frustrated but the casino claimed it was due to a breach of terms and conditions. No update since then.
係争中の金額: €1,800 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 2/2013
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
不明な申し立て、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 0
Player allegedly received a bonus they did not ask for.
According to the player they received a bonus they had never asked for and tried to cancel it. The casino informed the player since they had already started to wager, they had to finish the wagering requirements. The player would have rather withdrawn their deposit. The complaint remained unresolved. No update since then.
係争中の金額: £150 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 2/2013
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
過去の過失
ブラックポイント: 0
Player’s account was locked. The casino claimed it was due to a duplicate account terms and conditions breach and an abusive behavior of the player.
The player complained their account was locked and all their funds were seized. The casino claimed it was due to a duplicate account terms and conditions breach and an abusive behavior of the player. According to the casino, the player had been already registered in a sister casino using a different identity. After the casino locked the player's account, they behaved abusively which the player admits. No update since then.
係争中の金額: ?? (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 9/2010
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
iGame Casinoに関するクレーム (同じオーナー)
規制当局:プレイヤーの主張は妥当
ブラックポイント: 724 (このカジノのポイント数72)
The player was unable to retrieve his money via debit MasterCard payment method.
Martin requested a withdrawal of €800 but wasn't able to retrieve the payment via his debit MasterCard so the money was sent back to the sender, the casino. After that, he suggested the casino to send the payment to him via his Neteller account or wire transfer. The casino was unable to track the payment and also stopped responding to Martin's emails. Martin contacted the MGA for help but there is no update available ever since then and the case remained unresolved.
係争中の金額: €800 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 6/2017
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
支払い遅延、払われる可能性は高い
ブラックポイント: 100 (このカジノのポイント数10)
Player's withdrawal request was delayed due to the payment provider complications.
The player requested a withdrawal of €36,58 via his bank transfer but the bank itself was experiencing technical difficulties and didn't accept the payment. The player then decided to withdraw the money via his Skrill account. But this time, it was the casino who caused the delay by haven't verified their Skrill account yet. There is no further information available.
係争中の金額: €36.58 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 1/2020
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
支払い遅延、払われる可能性は高い
ブラックポイント: 100 (このカジノのポイント数10)
Very log verification and withdrawal process for no reason.
Jarda made a withdrawal request of €500 and sent all the documents needed for verification. His ID was accepted right away, but his bank statement wasn't. He contacted the support and they told him he should wait 1-3 days for them to process. Ten days later, his documents were still under the investigation. Without any further information available, the case remained unresolved.
係争中の金額: €500 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 12/2018
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
反応がない、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 63 (このカジノのポイント数6)
Player's deposit wasn't credited to his player's account.
The player deposited €100 but the money never arrived at his player's account. He was able to provide proof with his bank account statements but the casino never responded to him. The complaint remains unsolved.
係争中の金額: €100 (現金)
このクレームの当事者: 11/2018
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
反応がない、良い規制当局
ブラックポイント: 36 (このカジノのポイント数3)
プレイヤーは非常に長いドキュメントの検証と引き出し処理を経験しました。
プレーヤーは、不明な金額の引き出しを要求し、完全な確認に必要なすべての書類と、顔とパスポートの詳細の両方がはっきりと見えるパスポートを手に持っている写真を送りました。カジノは、彼らが文書を受け取ったかどうか、または検証が成功したかどうかについてプレイヤーを更新しませんでした。利用可能な詳細情報はなく、ケースは未解決のままです。
係争中の金額: $100 (ボーナスマネー)
このクレームの当事者: 3/2017
さらに読む: askgamblers.com
さらに読む
さらにクレームを表示する(+21)

このカジノの関連クレームを見つけられましたか?それとも、あなた自身に悪い体験が起こりましたか?他のプレイヤーのためにも、クレームを提出しましょう。

*リスト内のクレーム掲載については、次のリンク先の内容に違反している場合のみです: 公平なギャンブルについて.

Unibet Casinoのボーナス

Unibet Casino
とても良い カジノの 評判 

入金額の100%から最大€100

初回入金ボーナス が運営 Unibet Casino
最低入金額: €10 出金上限: 上限なし ボーナス対象外の決済方法: PaySafeCard, Skrill, Neteller
  • このボーナスの獲得には最低€10の入金が必要となります。
  • このボーナスには出金上限が設けられていません。しかし、賞金上限や出金上限など、全プレイヤーに適用されるその他の上限が設けられているかもしれません。
  • PaySafeCard, Skrill or Netellerを利用して入金される場合、このボーナスの受取対象外となり、ボーナスを使った賞金が没収される場合もございます。
賭け条件: 25xボーナス (各種制限が適用されます)
  • 賞金額を出金するための賭け条件はボーナス金額の25倍となっています。
  • 例えば、€100を入金して、€100のボーナスを取得した場合、出金を行うためには €2,500(€100×25)が賭け条件となります。
  • 賭け条件に対する寄与率が低くなっているゲームの種類もございます:スロット 100%, ルーレット 10%, ブラックジャック 10%, ビデオポーカー 10%, バカラ 10%, クラップス 10%
すぐにこのボーナスは取得できるはずです
  • Casino Guruのテスターとその他のプレイヤーからのフィードバックによれば、このボーナスの取得手順はある程度すぐ完了するようです。
新規プレイヤーのみ 18歳以上、 rgf.org.mt (Responsible Gaming Foundation) ライブゲームには35倍のボーナス賭け金要件があります 完全な条件が適用されます ボーナスはオプトインの30日後に有効期限が切れます
ボーナスをゲット
Has bonus worked for you?
VPNの使用は禁止されています。

Unibet Casinoの決済方法

決済方法 入金
上限と手数料
出金
上限と手数料
出金時間
Skrill Skrill $20 - $15,000
$15 - $13,000
-
Neteller Neteller $20 - $15,000
$15 - $15,000
-
PaySafeCard PaySafeCard $10 - $1,000
手数料: 3.0%
利用不可 -
ecoPayz ecoPayz $20 - $15,000
$15 - $13,000
-
Mastercard Mastercard $10 - $50,000
$10 - $55,000
-
VISA VISA $10 - $50,000
手数料: 2.5%
$15 - $50,000
1 - 3
Trustly Trustly €5 - €6,000
$10 - $100,000
-
Solo Solo $10 - $50,000
$10 - $55,000
-
WebMoney WebMoney $20 - $250
利用不可 -
PayPal PayPal -
-
-
VISA Electron VISA Electron $10 - $50,000
手数料: 2.5%
$15 - $50,000
1 - 3
Switch Switch $10 - $50,000
$10 - $55,000
-
Maestro Maestro $10 - $50,000
利用不可 -
Bank transfer Bank transfer 利用不可 $25 - ?
-
Instant Banking Instant Banking $5 - $10,000
利用不可 -
Earthport Earthport - - -
PayNearMe PayNearMe -
利用不可 -

Unibet Casinoのゲーム

スロット
ルーレット
ブラックジャック
スポーツベッティング
ビデオポーカー
ビンゴ
バカラ
ジャックポットゲーム
ライブゲーム
ポーカー
クラップス
キノ
スクラッチカード
eスポーツベッティング
信頼性の高いカジノTop10
null
Vera&John Casino
10
null
Live Casino House
8.9
null
Casinoin
8.5
null
King Billy Casino (Curacao)
8.8
null
Casitabi Casino
8.5
null
Casumo Casino
10
null
LuckyNiki Casino
8.0
null
Alf Casino
8.4
null
Empire777 Casino
9.2
null
Justspin Casino
8.6
Unibet Casino
9.7/10
とても良い 評判
Unibet Casino
9.7/10
とても良い 評判
カジノにアクセス